On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>wrote:

> On 10 March 2011 20:17, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote:
> > You might have missed this patch, reporting a bug in 5.5, 5.6 and trunk:
> >
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=3203806&group_id=12694
> .
>
>
> Correct - I hadn't spotted that.
> I'll have a proper look at it in the morning.
>
> Question:
>   Is this
>      a)    a sufficiently significant problem,
> and/or
>      b)    a sufficiently trivial fix
>
> to warrent including in 5.5.1 at this late stage?
>

To answer your questions: that patch (already applied on trunk and 5.6
branch) contains a fix for a potential memory corruption problem. This issue
only affects those users that use a large number of file descriptors (more
than FD_SETSIZE).

Bart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to