2011/3/4 Wes Hardaker <harda...@users.sourceforge.net>
> >>>>> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:54:10 +0200, Timo Teräs <timo.te...@iki.fi>
> said:
>
> TT> What's the usual time frame for getting patches reviewed and committed?
> TT> Could someone take a look at this?
>
> It's actually on my todo list to go review the patches. They're always
> reviewed before the next release, and I (and others) try to do them
> frequently but it depends on our "real work" life as to when we get to
> them. The important thing is that because they're in the tracker we
> can't forget about them, so you put it in the right place!
>
> [and I got better for a bit about reviewing more regularly, but you hit
> me during a particularly busy time; I should have time next week to review]
>
As you can see on the tracker I've had a look at this patch. I stopped
however because I'm not convinced that the introduction of the new flag
NETSNMP_CACHE_AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED is justified.
See also
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3123596&group_id=12694&atid=312694
.
Bart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
