Working now, the problem was you need to pass the void pointer to snmp_sess_synch_response(), not the session pointer.
T On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:35 PM, th exterit <thexte...@gmail.com> wrote: > I followed README.threads but it still kept tripping up on the > corresponding snmp_sess_synch_response() function. > > I would be grateful if anyone would take a look at my code (edited for > brevity) and spot anything I'm doing wrong - http://pastebin.com/FxQ2AuCQ > > Theres something about that "status = snmp_sess_synch_response(sp, req, & > resp);" line it just doesn't like. > > Thanks, > T > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>wrote: > >> On 1 April 2011 16:47, th exterit <thexte...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Now, I've only just read that Net-SNMP isn't strictly thread safe. >> > Is there any way around this at all? >> >> Use the "Single Session" style of routines (snmp_sess_*) >> See README.threads for details >> >> >> Dave >> > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
