Ok, I have found in netsnmp_table_iterator_helper_handler(), it changes all
GETNEXT requests to GET. ( Line 778 in table_iterator.c for netsnmp-5.4.3).
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Zimmer Hu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using wireshark 1.2.11 to monitor SNMP traffic, I observed when I
> snmpwalk through MyTable, there are a lot of GETNEXT request sent out, but
> in my handler, branch GETNEXT doesn't get executed, the string I put there
> doesn't get printout. Same thing for netSnmpHostsTable and ifTable, they
> even have no branch for GETNEXT handling. What's happening inside net-snmp
> daemon?
>
> I'm using mbrowse to send snmpwalk command, and both GETNEXT and GETNEXT
> response show "Missing MIB" in wireshark, but the results still get
> displayed correctly.
>
> Thanks,
> -Zimmer
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
