On 6 June 2011 10:02, Leo Cacciari <[email protected]> wrote: > Should the code be under a defined(NETSNMP_WITH_OPAQUE_SPECIAL_TYPES) > switch?
No, I don't think so. That flag is really intended for special Opaque-based types that the library recognises (and can handle internally). (Such as the Float/Double types, or the SNMPv1 64-bit value) If you are working with "raw" opaque values, then there's no need to protect or omit this code. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
