Fairly sure this is the patch I submitted, if so, thanks for considering it and please see my comments inline
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Niels Baggesen <n...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure > --without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Isn't this a > bit overreacting? i don't need capability to disable regex so I'm fine if a regex lib is required > Actually, are there any reason to go for pcre for this, adding a > dependency that is not standard on BSD or Solaris (and probably AIX and > HP-UX) systems? Couldn't we just as well use the Posix regex that is > standard in libc? I'm sure I can adjust if that's the decision. FYI: I've been running the patch for while and have had no issues. Here's a copy of patch for reference. https://raw.github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/master/net-snmp/0001-Support-for-listing-processes-specified-in-ucd-snmp-.patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
