On Aug 29, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Niels Baggesen <n...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Den 29-08-2012 01:46, Wes Hardaker skrev: >> Well, I was just about to add a "+1" and apply it... But there is one >> problem, it's a new feature technically... > > No, it adds a case that was forgotten in the original implementation. It > is a without a doubt a bug fix. This is definitely how I came across it - "there is a bug when printing string values that follow a TimeTicks", not "gee do I wish TimeTicks were printed nicely, that would be a good new feature". Bill > > /Niels > > -- > Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net > The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
