On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Andrew Hood <ajh...@fl.net.au> wrote:

> On 19/07/2013 5:47 AM, O'hara, Joseph (Contractor) wrote:
>
> > Hi net-snmp-coders,
> > I am having trouble compiling the NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB which I just
> > downloaded
> > from your website. I am using the latest version of the MB-Soft MIB
> > Browser with Compiler.
> > The indicated errors are here:
> > NsExtendOutput1Entry ::= SEQUENCE {
> > nsExtendOutput1Line DisplayString,
> > nsExtendOutputFull DisplayString,
> > nsExtendOutNumLines INTEGER, <----compiler says Item
> > "nsExtendOutNumLines" in sequence "NsExtendOutput1Entry" has
> > conflicting syntax specified
> > nsExtendResult INTEGER <---compiler says Item "nsExtendResult" in
> > sequence "NsExtendOutput1Entry" has conflicting syntax specified
> > }
> > I’m no expert in ASN.1 but I can’t find what the problem is. I even
> > looked in the imports
> > files to see if those names were defined there.
> nsExtendOutNumLinesand nsExtendResult are described here as INTEGER but
> are later defined as Integer32. Interestingly smilint doesn't pick this
> one up. It does pick up a number of objects defined as INTEGER when they
> should be Integer32
>

I can't speak to your real problems, but  when you look at the underlying
definition for Integer32 you see that its actually defined as:

 Integer32 ::=
        INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)

So they are the same thing...
therefore I would not expect that lint would (or should) complain.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to