On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:05:29 +0100 Tim wrote:
TC> "
TC> This really should be handled higher up, instead of each module having
TC> to do it on it's own. And the nsCacheTable should probably store
TC> configured valued in the persistent storage so values survive a restart.
TC> "
TC> 
TC> By this do you mean it should behandled from within net-snmp rather than
TC> each shared library?
TC> 
TC> If so, this would require an enhancement to the current agent code.
TC> 
TC> I'm no expert in the internals of the  agent code, so how would such an
TC> enhancement be  possible?

Yes, I think the library should handle this. And yes, it should be possible.

TC> Also, my shared object needs to work with net-nsmp 5.5 and/or later, so
TC> any such enhancement would need to be merged back into older versions.
TC> Would this even be possible?

Unfortunately not. There won't be any more releases in the 5.5 line (from
us; your distro may continue to support it, but probably only with security
related patches). But you should be able to fake it by including relevant
code in your shared library.

Robert

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to