Hi Li, Check whenever `getnext` is working correctly on a each oid in oid sub tree. It seems that your mib-browser tool uses `getbulk` request type which usually not subjected to this problem
Usually this can be done by exporting oids from `snmpbulkwalk -On ...` command on a oid sub tree. Then, make snmpget/snmpgetnext for each of the exported oid and check that results are correct. Regards, Fedor On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:48 AM, LI Zhigang A < zhigang.a...@alcatel-sbell.com.cn> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > When we run snmpwalk command, we found an issue, which is as following: > > > > $ snmpwalk -v2c -c public 135.249.23.230 enterprises.637.61.1.40.12.4.1.1 > > SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.637.61.1.40.12.4.1.1.1853751296 = INTEGER: > 1853751296 > > SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.637.61.1.40.12.4.1.1.283246592 = INTEGER: 283246592 > > Error: OID not increasing: > SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.637.61.1.40.12.4.1.1.1853751296 > > >= SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.637.61.1.40.12.4.1.1.283246592 > > > > But if I use mib-browser tools to walk this mib table > extDhcpRelayPortStatsSumEntry (1.3.6.1.4.1.637.61.1.40.12.4.1), it is OK, > the output is as following: > > [image: cid:image002.png@01D0C963.0FA7E0F0] > > > > So could you please help us to check this snmpwalk issue? > > I expect your feedback sincerely! > > > > > > Best regards, > > LI Zhigang > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
