I conclude the net-snmp maintainers have no engagement model.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:50 PM, David Hankins <dhank...@twitter.com> wrote:
> I've had a pull request in sourceforge open since March. It's not a huge
> deal, it fixes a problem where a single error in a python NetSNMP session
> causes all subsequent requests to be treated as errors (even if they
> succeeded).
>
> But I have a bunch of other changes queued up to send you behind this,
> enabling a native net-snmp asynchronous SNMP api in python, and I'm not
> looking forward to spending similar amounts of time on this to get the
> changes merged.
>
> Is there a trade show or standards event I can meet you at to hash out
> code review and acceptance 1:1?
>
> How exactly do you want to be engaged?
>
> Do you want to be engaged at all?
>
> Shall I just fork net-snmp's python module?
>
> --
> Infrastructure Management Services
> Twitter, Inc.
>
--
Infrastructure Management Services
Twitter, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
