Are you speaking about the one I have mentioned above.(https://bugzilla.
redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=98840&action=diff) .
Yes, I have tried this patch but i am getting some error while applying it.
and that is the reason i came here with some hope. I wonder if there is
something need to change from net-snmp code, why this patch is not present
in 5.7.3.
Anyways, This is the error which i am getting while applying above patch.
| mibII/ipAddr.c: In function 'var_ipAddrEntry':
| mibII/ipAddr.c:202: error: storage size of 'in_ifaddr' isn't known
This error is pointing out to below newly added code as per the redHat
diff changes.
+#if defined(linux)
+ static struct in_ifaddr in_ifaddr;
+#endif
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looked at the RedHat bug, and it said that the kernel was providing the
> wrong ifIndex values to net-snmp. It also said that patch worked around
> the issue. Did you try the patch?
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Soubhagya Panigrahi <
> srpanigrahi1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bill, I know this is a very old kernel version we are using, but for this
>> issue, i don't think it is recommended to upgrade the kernel.
>> This issue is a blocker for us. So it would be a great help if someone
>> can point me out what is the problem and how can we proceed towards closure
>> of this issue with 2.6.32 kernel version.
>>
>> Really looking forward for some pointers.
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am afraid I don't have anything to add - I have no experience with
>>> such old kernel.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Soubhagya Panigrahi <
>>> srpanigrahi1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bill,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your response.
>>>>
>>>> Here, The SNMP server is running on Linux platform with 2.6.23 kernel
>>>> verison.
>>>>
>>>> One more info : I googled about this issue and found below patch.
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=98840&action=diff
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Regards*,
>>>> Soubhagya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Soubhagya,
>>>>>
>>>>> What kind of system is running the SNMP server that you're querying?
>>>>> E.g., it's Debian 7 running net-snmp 5.7.3, or ...? (Not the client,
>>>>> which
>>>>> you've already said is net-snmp 5.7.3).
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Soubhagya Panigrahi <
>>>>> srpanigrahi1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to fetch the ip details using ipAddrTable. snmpwalk
>>>>>> command output of "ipAdEntIfIndex" is not matching with ifIndex output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Description of ipAdEntIfIndex : The index value which uniquely
>>>>>> identifies the interface to which this entry is applicable. The interface
>>>>>> identified by a particular value of this index is the same interface as
>>>>>> identified by the same value of the IF-MIB's ifIndex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sharing some imp information to understand the issue better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> verison using : Net-SNMP-5.7.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snmpwalk -v2c localhost -c public ipAdEntIfIndex
>>>>>> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.9.103.59.162 = INTEGER: 13
>>>>>> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.55.55.55.62 = INTEGER: 14
>>>>>> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snmpwalk -v2c localhost -c public ifIndex
>>>>>> IF-MIB::ifIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1
>>>>>> IF-MIB::ifIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snmpwalk -v2c localhost -c public ifName
>>>>>> IF-MIB::ifName.1 = STRING: Virtual 1/0
>>>>>> IF-MIB::ifName.2 = STRING: Virtual 2/0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Virtual 1/0 : 9.103.59.162
>>>>>> Virtual 2/0 : 55.55.55.62
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you can see, assigned IP of virtual interface 1/0 is 9.103.59.162.
>>>>>> it is mapped to ifName.1 and ifIndex.1. But as per ipAdEntIfIndex output,
>>>>>> it shows some random values as 13. Same case goes for interface 2/0 as
>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kindly let me know if this is a known issue and any available patch
>>>>>> for same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Regards*,
>>>>>> Soubhagya
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Net-snmp-coders mailing list
>>>>>> Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Regards*,
>> Soubhagya
>>
>
>
--
*Regards*,
Soubhagya
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
