On 05/06/17 20:48, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 05:31:06PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 05/04/17 14:52, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>> On 05/04/17 00:25, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>>>> I looks like the change 9641b472ef01208f92631016e91b0a4a518163f0 (openssl
>>>>> 1.1.0: Fix several build errors) broke the build on machines where openssl
>>>>> is missing, I suppose this wasn't intentional?
>>>>
>>>> Indeed ... the goal was to fix build errors instead of introducing new
>>>> build errors. What build breakage did you encounter?
>>>
>>> I have a host where openssl isn't installed.
>>>
>>> I am trying to compile apps/snmpusm.c.
>>>
>>> On this host, HAVE_DH_GET0_PQG obviously isn't defined and so the
>>> #if !defined(HAVE_DH_GET0_PQG) on line 126 is triggered.
>>> On line 129 the source then tries to include <openssl/dh.h> but that fails
>>> since openssl ain't installed.
>>
>> Hello Magnus,
>>
>> This should now also have been fixed.
> 
> Yes, this exact issue is fixed but there is a similar issue regarding
> HAVE_DH_GET0_KEY in the DH_get0_key function right below DH_get0_pqg.

Hello Magnus,

That issue should now also be fixed. Sorry that I had overlooked it.

Bart.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to