----- Original Message -----
| From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
| Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 8:13:37 AM
| 
| I don't know whether this is fixed already, but in net-snmp-5.4.2.1 there is
| the problem that after restarting the network stack, bonding and bridge
| devices appear twice (with the same name), but with different status...
| 

This issue was reported from net-snmp-5.7.3

Josef

| >>> Josef Ridky <jri...@redhat.com> schrieb am 25.05.2017 um 15:12 in
| >>> Nachricht
| <87738501.15716165.1495717967019.javamail.zim...@redhat.com>:
| > Hi,
| > 
| > I would like to ask you for your opinion/hint about this report:
| > 
| > ------- BEGIN -------
| > Description of problem:
| > SNMP IF-MIB::ifOperStatus doesn't report correct status of NIC if it is
| > brought down with ifdown command
| > 
| > Steps to Reproduce:
| > 1. Install net-snmp
| > 2. Bring down network interface using ifdown
| > 3. Execute $snmpwalk -v 2c  -c public localhost interface
| > 
| > Actual results:
| > net-snmp reports incorrect ifOperStatus
| > 
| > Expected results:
| > net-snmp should reports correct ifOperStatus
| > 
| > Additional info:
| > 
| > [root@dhcp5-123 ~]# ifdown eth0
| > Device 'eth0' successfully disconnected.
| > 
| > [root@dhcp5-123 ~]# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2
| > IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: lo
| > IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: ens3
| > IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: virbr0
| > IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: virbr0-nic
| > IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: eth0
| > 
| > [root@dhcp5-123 ~]# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8
| > IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.1 = INTEGER: up(1)
| > IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.2 = INTEGER: up(1)
| > IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.3 = INTEGER: down(2)
| > IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.4 = INTEGER: down(2)
| > IF-MIB::ifOperStatus.5 = INTEGER: up(1)
| > 
| > ------- End -------
| > 
| > I have found, that in case, the LAN cable is physically unplugged, than
| > ifOperStatus is correct.
| > However, when are used ifup/ifdown commands, than ifOperStatus is wrong.
| > 
| > Do you have any workaround or hint how can be this issue solved?
| > 
| > Regards
| > 
| > Josef Ridky
| > Associate Software Engineer
| > Core Services Team
| > Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
| > 
| > 
| > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| > _______________________________________________
| > Net-snmp-coders mailing list
| > Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
| > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to