Keith Mendoza <ke...@icei.org> writes:

> Now that development is going to be done on github, what I would
> recommend is forking from the official net-snmp and then maybe create
> a branch on your github fork.

Why do you think that's better than submitting it as a branch within the
offical fork?  Just to reduce object growth?

> That way github's merge request can be utilized fully.

How does that help in this case?  I guess it allows commenting on
individual changes, but I think the changes are likely too large to be
beneficial to that.

> We from ICEI (ian, Eric, me) are interested in seeing what you have so
> far and maybe we can help pick up from there.

One of the problems I know we'll hit is that the patch was done against
a much earlier point between 5.7 and 5.8 and there will be conflicts and
issues because of it.  But I will try to get that branched from
hopefully the right point where it still works.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to