Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> writes: > So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of > fixing the regression, with the caveat that I really think that this > whole area needs to be revisited.
I think this comment is spot on. So I'd accept the patch too, though my gut reaction is to revert to whatever was in 5.7.1 because of the late point in this release cycle and we're redsigning critical code on the fly right before a release. We really need a test C function to check this stuff. Any volunteers? (I'm not a UTF-8 expert at all) -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
