>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:43:55 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> So when the table handler is freed, the accompanying table Dave> structure should be freed as well. That's certainly how I Dave> understand this is meant to work. Dave> Wes? Anything to add? Unfortunately, I don't remember either. Generally the free-ing routines only free stuff for a particular handler, and if you actually are holding on to a chain you'll need to free each one in the chain by hand. In part this is because the pointers to the other handlers are not something that are known to any given handler... What we might consider doing in the future is registering them with a free function pointer as well.... But we don't now. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
