> My doubt is: is it ok to have sub-nodes in a table? No. Mib2c may not complain, but this is not valid.
What you need to do is define *two* tables: > myTable > | > |-----column1 > |-----column2 > |-----column5 indexed by "myIndex" (as before), and > myTable2 > | > |-----column3 > |-----sub-item1 > |-----sub-item2 > |-----column4 > |-----sub-item3 > |-----sub-item4 indexed by "myIndex" (the same object as "myTable") and a new "myIndex2". A management application can then take these two (separate, linked) tables, and merge the data to give the *appearance* of a table-within-a-table. But you can't do this directly. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
