[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all my experimenting, the <name> and <secName> fields seem to be the same. Is that right? What would make them different?

The usmUser line is modelled after the usmUserTable from SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB. The description for SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB::usmUserSecurityName tells:

  The default transformation of the User-based Security
  Model dependent security ID to the securityName and
  vice versa is the identity function so that the
  securityName is the same as the userName.

For any other question that may pop up for you, reading the MIB
and RFC3414 is supposed to be enlightening.


Hope this helps, +Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge. Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to