On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:28:19 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> Jean-Michel Favre wrote: TA> > I'am at present testing embedded perl both as an TA> > extension of snmpd and snmptrapd. (net-snmp 5.2.pre2). TA> > TA> > The perl extension to snmptrapd consumes a large amount of TA> > memory even when the perl trap handler is a single return instruction. TA> TA> Yep, that's bug 1009927 (for embedded perl in snmpd): TA> TA> While the embedded perl feature rocks in principle, those memory leaks TA> *unfortunately* don't allow for production use yet. Does anyone care?
Yes, but that doesn't mean it's a higher priority than all the other stuff I care about but don't get paid to take care of (like my family). Remember, we are volunteers here. And you have the code too. Don't you care? Now if you'd like to discuss paid support, then that's another matter. Until then, no whining please. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
