On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:23:28 +0900 Murali wrote: MB> On our systems, the net-snmp version is 5.0.1 which doesnot have the MB> ipCidrRouteNumber.
As I said before, it hasn't been implemented yet. It should be available in 5.2.1 for Linux. MB> Can I directly upgrade the snmp version to latest MB> one with the rmp available on the net-snmp.org? Depends on where you are coming from. If the existing version if a vendor rpm, it might not recognize our rpm as an upgrade. It might be easier to remove the previous version first. But that might cause dependency problems. Might be easier to check what the latest version offered by the vendor is. MB> RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteDest.0.0.0.0 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0 MB> RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteDest.127.0.0.0 = IpAddress: 127.0.0.0 MB> RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteDest.172.17.12.0 = IpAddress: 172.17.12.0 MB> MB> Please let me know how to count the number of responses from this and MB> also what would that response stand for? This tells you that your (IPv4) route table has 3 entries. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
