Hi, Shuki. Thank you for your information. That's sufficiently for me to understand the problem and solve it.
I submit this patch on http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1110571&group_id=12694&atid=312694 If I take any mistakes in the contents of the above URL, please guide me. I hope this patch will be included into a source-code tree. Thanks! Katsuhisa ABE Cyber Solutions Inc. http://www.cysol.co.jp/ Subject: RE: Using Net-Snmp for IPv6 and IPv4 simultaneously for both TCP and UDP. Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:36:25 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sasson_shuki> Hi Katsuhisa, I have applied the suggested patch as supplied to sasson_shuki> snmpTCPIPv6Domain.c. sasson_shuki> Everything is working as expected. sasson_shuki> Means one can specify: sasson_shuki> Agent listen to any IPv6 address on port=161 and IPv4 traffic will be sasson_shuki> refused as expected. Also now one may put all 4 transports on the command sasson_shuki> line as follows: sasson_shuki> ./snmpd udp:161 tcp6:161 udp6:161 tcp:161 -f -L -d sasson_shuki> sasson_shuki> I assume that this may not be a Fedora/Linux specific bug (it depends on the sasson_shuki> semantics of the bind for any IPv6 address). sasson_shuki> sasson_shuki> I assume that this patch will be applied to a future release of Net-Snmp. sasson_shuki> Let me know if you need more information. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
