On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:40:28 +1100 Bruno wrote: BM> We've just received a new array and after installing Net-SNMP 5.2.1 on BM> it (Fedora Core 2, custom kernel mods), the 3.7TB are now causing some BM> problems. BM> BM> # snmpwalk -v2c -c XXXXXXXXXXXX MYHOSTNAME .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.9.1.7 BM> UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskAvail.1 = INTEGER: 27951168 BM> UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskAvail.2 = INTEGER: -2147483648
That's because 3.7 TB overflows a 32bit int. BM> The strange thing is that if I use snmpdf ... I get the right value :? BM> BM> # snmpdf -v2c -c XXXXXXXXXXXX MYHOSTNAME BM> Description size (kB) Used Available Used% BM> [ ... ] BM> /export 3904303104 78306464 3825996640 2% snmpdf will use the host resources table by default.. try walking that and see if you can find a better valued to graph... -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted unless they are requests for paid consulting services. Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users