On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:03:13 -0500 Gary wrote:
GC> Has anybody seen the memory leaks with Red Hat 9 Net-SNMP 5.1.2?
GC> I'm using the function CONTAINER_REMOVE to remove the context but its looks
GC> like it does not free memory?
Correct. It simply removes the item from the container. The container is dumb,
and doesn't know how the thing it is holding was allocated (or if it was
allocated at all).
CC> Eek? Has anybodyelse seen this? The context does
GC> appear to be free from the list but no memory deallocation?
Which conf file/helper are you using?
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
