On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:02:10 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 14:54, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > Ok, I found my mistake. Reverse the previous patch,
DS> > and apply this one instead...
DS>
DS>
DS> @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@
DS> session->version = SNMP_DEFAULT_VERSION;
DS> session->securityModel = SNMP_DEFAULT_SECMODEL;
DS> session->rcvMsgMaxSize = SNMP_MAX_MSG_SIZE;
DS> + session->flags &= SNMP_FLAGS_DONT_PROBE;
DS> }
DS>
DS>
DS> Err... did you *really* mean that, Robert?
Doh!
DS> Normally I'd expect to see either:
DS>
DS> session->flags |= SNMP_FLAGS_DONT_PROBE;
DS> (to set the flag)
Yeah, that's what it should be..
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
