On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I put the non-repeater value to anything 1 and higher it works
> fine.

If you're running 'snmpbulkwalk', then presumably you're only
supplying a single OID to work with?

In which case, setting a non-repeater value of 1 (or more),
means that you're not actually using the bulk retrieval aspect
of the GetBulk request.  If you're querying for a single OID,
and saying "don't repeat this OID", then that's equivalent
to a straight GetNext-based walk.



> Then to get the entire table with a snmpbulkget I set -Cr to that
> number(33). It worked fine, no "no more variables". When I increased
> the number to 34, again it works fine, got a scalar object that is in
> the next object group as well. But, when I increased it to 35, that is
> when I saw the "no more variables".

Hmmm...
What happens if you run a single "snmpgetnext" request on the
scalar instance OID ?
What about a "snmpbulkget -Cr 1 " on the scalar instance OID?
What about a "snmpbulkget -Cr 2 " on the scalar *object* OID?

Dave



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to