On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:59:53 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 15:55, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > On 10 Jun 2005 19:26:22 +0530 Sasikumar wrote:
DS> > SB> When i was testing the set i noticed that in the function
DS> > SB> netsnmp_check_requests_status() requests->status is set as
DS> > SB> SNMP_ERR_NOTWRITABLE before calling MODE_SET_RESERVE1 can nay one
DS> > SB> tell me why this is happening. Is it am i doing anything wrong.
DS> >
DS> > Sounds like access control. How is your access control set up?
DS>
DS> I know a lot of problems often come down to access control, but
DS> I'm not convinced it's the case this time. If the access control
DS> entries don't allow write access to a particular area of the tree,
DS> surely those handlers just won't be called at all?
True. I suppose I was thinking about a get-next call, where vacm is done
afterwards. For a set, it should be done first.
So, I guess he's left with tracing through the code to see exactly where the
error is set, and why.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
