Hello, Thanks for your reply. I'll discuss with my team whether we implement those or not. (I'm not able to promise implementing them, though.)
Best Regards, ------ Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005/06/24 17:08:00: > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 06:27, Mitsuru Chinen wrote: > > Is there any plan to implement the tables in the new RFCs into > > the agent side? (such as tcpConnectionTable, udpEndpointTable) > > We can add them to the wish-list, certainly. > > I suspect that actually implementing them will have to wait > for someone who needs to make use of this new structure, and > is prepared to do the work. There is a *looong* list of new > and updated MIBs that we'd like to add to the agent, and > relatively few coders likely to attempt them. These two MIBs > probably don't rank particularly highly on that list. > > > But of course, if you'd like to implement these updates (or > fund someone to do this), and feed the necessary changes back > to the project, then we'd be happy to include them in future > releases. > > Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
