On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:57:41 -0500 Wu, wrote:
WLA> I was away for few days, Today, I check the snmptrapd, it core dump less
WLA> a day (6/21 14:01:54 to 6/22 11:31), although the memory did not
WLA> increase, but it is still core dump in the same place, please see the
WLA> attachment. So I am guessing the memory leak may be not the root cause
WLA> of the core dump ??
> #0 0xff196054 in sprint_realloc_integer (buf=0xffbeea98, buf_len=0xffbeea94,
> out_len=0xffbeea90, allow_realloc=1, var=0x30060, enums=0x0, hint=0x0,
> units=0x0) at mib.c:1333
> 1333 sprintf(str, "%ld", *var->val.integer);
Next time you hit this, try:
print var
print *var
print var->val.integer
print *var->val.integer
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
