On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:23:22 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> Ok, that would seem to indicate a problem with the math. Can you apply this RS> patch and let me know if any asserts show up in your logs when you get the RS> counter overflow? I think you will, but want to be sure...
Well, it would have helped if I had attached the patch, eh? No worries, I'm
certain as to what the results would be, so I've got a fix to test instead...
Let me know if this helps.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
int64-overflow.pat
Description: Binary data
