On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:58:29 -0700 (PDT) MEENA wrote:
MS> =ERROR REPORT==== 16-Aug-2005::10:25:42 ===
MS> Error in
MS> process <0.1043.0> on node '
MS> [EMAIL PROTECTED]' with exit value:
MS> {function_clause,[{oam_snmp_snas,get_switch_t
MS>
able,[1,{'1','1'}]},{erl_eval,do_apply,5},{shell,exprs,6},{shell,eval_loop,3}]}
This doesn't look like it's net-snmp, so we can't help you there.
MS> Also is it possible to suppress searching beyond for
MS> next available instance if endOfTable is encountered.
But I can answer this - no. A get-next must continue beyond the table and look
for the next instance. That is how the protocol specifies it should work.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
