On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 21:22 +0100, Ole Bjørn Hessen wrote: > 1. Is there a way for the perl SNMP bulkwalk to discover non-increasing > OIDs ? The "snmpbulkwalk"-commands discovers this error, and stops > processing. Why does not the perl discover this and returns the handle?
Because no-one has written the necessary code. The project has generally had relatively few perl-competent developers compared to C programmers. Yes - it would definitely be sensible for the perl routine to handle this situation. If you haven't already done so, it would probably be sensible to log this as a bug in the SF tracker system. (We *do* respond to items there - if not always as promptly as we would like). Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
