On Tuesday 14 February 2006 13:19, Dave Shield wrote: > The difference between the two lies in how they treat any objects > *outside* .1.3.6.1. The first configuration would allow access, > the second would deny access. > Of course, if there are no such objects, then it's all a bit > irrelevant!
aaaaah. Ok. So to put that in other words, it is safe to say something like the following: If no "include" is explicitly mentioned then you have access to everything, but once you mention an include, that then becomes the ONLY tree you can access. Is that a fair summary? Helen. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
