After extracting the net-snmp components out of my app and testing memory growth it appears to be stable. I must have jumped to the wrong conclusion :-(
This is the case for both ucd-snmp and net-snmp. On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:00:56 +0000 Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying > any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time > or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. > Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn > and offer advice. Thanks. ] > >On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:43 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I can try to move to Net-SNMP I guess, but that would mean >> that I have to re-write all my existing code. > >No. >We've got more MIB modules than you have, and we didn't >want to have to rewrite them either :-) > > >> Is there any backward compatability? > >Yes. > >> Would the code in my example still work? > >Yes. > >Dave Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
