On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 16:59 +0530, Ajay Hotchandani wrote: > I tried with "net-snmp-5.2.2", and it works. > It gives output of commands: > 1. snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.6 > 2. Also, I get proper outputs for my MIB.
That's what I half-suspected. > What I conclude from this, there is some problem with FC4 64-bit > provided net-snmp: > net-snmp-5.2.1.2-fc4.1 (Updated version of FC4) > net-snmp-5.2.1-12 (Standard version provided while installation) > With these net-snmp versions, above both the points are not working. I seem to remember that there was a fair bit of work done on 64-bit support between release 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 (which I why I suggested you try upgrading). Unless Fedora release an updated version based on 5.2.2 (or at least including the relevant patches), then I think you'll probably have to upgrade manually. I note that Fedora 5 seems to be using 5.3 (hopefully *including* the 5.3.0.1 fix!) > For second point, I get output of my whole MIB, but after output > of last OID, I get "Timeout: No Response ..." error message. > As, it is working fine with "net-snmp-5.1-2.1" (FC1 64-bit) and > "net-snmp-5.2.2" (FC4 64-bit), it doesn't seem 64-bit related issue either. No - I'm fairly sure that it *is* a 64-bit issue. The 5.2.1 agent will include several MIB modules that weren't part of the default 5.1 configuration (or were updated in the meantime). If there's a problem with one of these, it wouldn't bite with the 5.1 agent. > If possible, then how can I statically load MIBs like "SNMPv2-SMI.txt, > SNMPv2-TC.txt etc." in agent? (Please take a note that here, net-snmp is > installed through rpm) Please see the FAQ entry: How do I add a MIB to the tools? > If I am not wrong then above MIBs are responsible for providing > output for OID ".1.3.6.1.6". Sorry - you are wrong in this. The MIB files are used to convert between numeric OIDs and the more meaningful names. They are *NOT* relevant for whether the agent provides particular information or not. Please see the FAQ entry: How do I add a MIB to the agent? This is touched on in a number of places in the FAQ (and elsewhere). I simply do not have the time to regurgitate documentation at you - please can you ready through this for yourself. I'd also appreciate if you could direct future queries to the mailing list only, and *not* directly to me. My department is about to move buildings, and it's an extremely busy (and stressful!) time for the technical staff here. I'll be unsubscribing from the list fairly shortly, as I simply cannot provide any Net-SNMP support while this move is going on. I'm sure Thomas and the others will be able to offer suitable assistance in my absence. Thank you for your understanding. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
