ahh, yes. but ... it affects both --sk
Dave Shield wrote: > On 08/09/06, Stuart Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i've found that snmpbulkwalk becomes unhappy when doing this against >> some devices -- thus far, all Cisco switches > >> am i looking at a bug in net-snmp? or am i looking at a bug in Cisco's >> SNMP agent? can you think of a work-around? > > Well the first question that immediately springs to mind: > - does this just affect "snmpbulkwalk" (i.e. GETBULK requests), or > does it hit "snmpwalk" (GETNEXT) as well? > > That would be a very simple potential workaround > Definitely worth checking. > > Dave > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-users mailing list > Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
