On 06/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your response. But suppose one create (SNMPSET) success and > one create (SNMPSET) request fails
Are these two separate SNMP SET requests, or two row creation assignments, bundled within a single SNMP SET request? I'm assuming the latter (given your original question), but this phrasing tends to imply the former. > then do we need to > delete the first > row as SET request is atomic? Yes - assuming this is a single SNMP SET request. That's exactly right. If the SET request fails, then neither row should be created. Of course, if the two rows are created using two separate SET requests, then it's perfectly valid for one creation to succeed, and the other to fail. But if you're putting both creation assignments into the same SET request, then they must stand or fall together. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
