Hello Dave, > No - keep the same three tables, but add an extra object to the INDEX clause. > So that the tables are now indexed by 'ifIndex' plus the previous indices.
I am not much aware of using ifIndex as of concept is concerned its fine can you guide me any kind of reference or Docs form where I can get the information, so that I can implement using ifIndex > > As far as the structure of the MIB is concerned, these are "completely > separate" tables (so you don't have a table-under-a-table, which is > invalid). But because there's a shared index object ifIndex), your > tables can be merged with the standard ifTable, to mimic the effect of > a set of tables-within-a-table. > > You do *not* need to define four separate copies of each table. > > > Dave > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
