|
Dear Mr
Dave
Mistakenly I sent with out checking "CC" and I will take care that issue from now My system is having 3 xDSL Interfaces, when ever an Alarm is genetrated during the working of the xDSL Interface I should notify the manager with a trap message that an alarm had occured These are the alarms which I need to monitor "Local Pair 1", "Local Pair 2", "Remote Pair 1" & "Remote Pair 2" as I said I am having 3 xDSL Interfaces the above said 4 Alarms are applicable to all the 3 Interfaces So, My intention was rather than creating 4*3 Traps I tought to create table and keep Traps as seperate Part so this was the MIB's which I have created -- xDSL Traps Table xdsltrapTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF XDSLEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "A table of E1 switch port configuration information." ::= { xDSL 2 } xdslEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX XDSLEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "A table entry containing " INDEX { interface1,interface2,interface3 } ::= { xdsltrapTable 1 } XDSLEntry ::= SEQUENCE { InterfaceNo INTEGER, SystemType INTEGER, LocalPair1 INTEGER, LocalPair2 INTEGER, RemotePair1 INTEGER, RemotePair2 INTEGER } TableCardNo OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER (1..3) ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION " " ::= { xdslaEntry 1 } SystemType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION " " ::= { xdslaEntry 2 } LocalPair1 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION " " ::= { xdslaEntry 3 } LocalPair2 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION " " ::= { xdslaEntry 4 } RemotePair1 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION " " ::= { xdslaEntry 5 } RemotePair2 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION " " ::= { xdslaEntry 6 } when I started the code for this I got the confusion what OID i need to Specify for particular entity so to get the confirmation I asked you, which I am partially clear about Now, I suppose that I *cannot* do this way because I cannot define Index to apply to the trap OID. which I came to know from your previous mail >If you defined the MIB as a single table covering all four interfaces >(so that the objects are the same in each case), then you would only >need a single set of 6 traps. how to I implement the above idea thanks santhosh |
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
