I have submitted patch #1712645, which prints something more useful and prints it only once.
Jan On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 09:53 +0200, Jan Safranek wrote: > [I am sorry for not sending cc: to the list] > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:44 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > I've never used the bonding feature in RHEL described here; but I've > > used Cisco IOS EthernetChannel, FreeBSD Netgraph, OpenBSD trunk(4); -- > > all 802.3ad + LACP compliant. > > > > They all use underlying physical interfaces in IPv4-less mode; while > > assigning IPv4 to the new logical a > > ddress. > > > > You're saying that is not the case with this implementation? > > > > ~BAS > > It looks like your configuration: physical NICs do not have IP, the > virtual bonding does: > > $ ifconfig > > bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:76:C2:C2 > inet addr:192.168.2.104 Bcast:192.168.2.255 > inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe76:c2c2/64 Scope:Link > ... > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:76:C2:C2 > inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe76:c2c2/64 Scope:Link > ... > eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:76:C2:CC > inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe76:c2c2/64 Scope:Link > ... > > And the log is full of > error on subcontainer 'ia_addr' insert (-1) > error on subcontainer 'ia_addr' insert (-1) > > Jan > > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:53 +0200, Jan Safranek wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:12 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately it's quite common to have one IP shared among more > > > > > interfaces - e.g. in PPTP server. > > > > > > > > This is a proxy-arp config? Are we talking about an embedded platform > > > > here? > > > > > > No, it's simple Red Hat Linux box. > > > > > > > Besides, if this is some type of RAS/Concentrator appliance, wouldn't > > > > there be a separate management interface for system-service abstraction? > > > > > > Well, I do not know the customer configuration in detail, but I am able > > > to reproduce the ugly log messages by setting channel bonding for > > > cluster: > > > http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_79_258.shtm > > > > > > > > > Anyway, I think it's not that important why there is such configuration > > > - the customer just wants it. I went through some of the MIBs and it > > > seems to me that IP-MIB does not allow to manage/monitor two interfaces > > > with the same IP address - there would be two values for one OID (e.g. > > > if both eth0 and eth1 have address 5.5.5.5, then e.g. > > > IP-MIB::ipAddressIfIndex.ipv4."5.5.5.5" should have value 2 and 3, which > > > is not possible from MIB point of view). > > > > > > So, if I understand it correctly, the second interface will be invisible > > > in IP-MIB. The appropriate CONTAINER_INSERT will fail, causing memory > > > leak (fixed by patch #1710632) and ugly error message every 30 seconds. > > > > > > I'll try to get rid of the periodical error messages and display > > > something meaningful only once. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-users mailing list > Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
