Tom,It doesn't appear to cover the smux traffic.  It also appears that the -d 
isn't working on the 5.0.9 agent.  This is what I got from the 5.3 Agent.  I 
can see the outgoing trap traffic.Got trap from peer on fd 21no storage for 
OIDno storage for OIDno storage for OIDno storage for OIDno storage for 
OIDsnmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user exists) (Internal 
error in type switching)Sending 230 bytes to UDP: [xxxxxxx]:162                 
                                                                        
0.......XXXXX0016: A7 81 D3 02  04 62 9E D4  34 02 01 00  02 01 00 30    
.....b..4......00032: 81 C4 30 0E  06 08 2B 06  01 02 01 01  03 00 43 02    
..0...+.......C.0048: 3E 80 30 1B  06 0A 2B 06  01 06 03 01  01 04 01 00    
>.0...+.........0064: 06 0D 2B 06  01 04 01 85  22 D5 0C 01  00 88 1C 30    
..+....."......00080: 28 06 0F 2B  06 01 04 01  85 22 D5 0C  01 A7 08 0A    
(..+....."......0096: 01 00 04 15  00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00    
................0112: 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00  00 30 15 06  0F 2B 06 01    
.........0...+..0128: 04 01 85 22  D5 0C 01 A7  08 0A 02 00  06 02 00 00    
..."............0144: 30 13 06 0F  2B 06 01 04  01 85 22 D5  0C 01 A7 08    
0...+.....".....0160: 0A 03 00 04  00 30 14 06  0F 2B 06 01  04 01 85 22    
.....0...+....."0176: D5 0C 01 A7  08 0A 04 00  02 01 00 30  14 06 0F 2B    
...........0...+0192: 06 01 04 01  85 22 D5 0C  01 A7 08 0A  05 00 02 01    
....."..........0208: 00 30 13 06  0F 2B 06 01  04 01 85 22  D5 0C 01 A7    
.0...+....."....0224: 08 0A 06 00  04 00                                    
......snmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user exists) <--- 
not worried about this.Sending 230 bytes to UDP: [xxxxxxxx]:162                 
                                                                       
0.......XXXXX0016: A7 81 D3 02  04 62 9E D4  34 02 01 00  02 01 00 30    
.....b..4......00032: 81 C4 30 0E  06 08 2B 06  01 02 01 01  03 00 43 02    
..0...+.......C.0048: 3E 80 30 1B  06 0A 2B 06  01 06 03 01  01 04 01 00    
>.0...+.........0064: 06 0D 2B 06  01 04 01 85  22 D5 0C 01  00 88 1C 30    
..+....."......00080: 28 06 0F 2B  06 01 04 01  85 22 D5 0C  01 A7 08 0A    
(..+....."......0096: 01 00 04 15  00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00    
................0112: 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00  00 30 15 06  0F 2B 06 01    
.........0...+..0128: 04 01 85 22  D5 0C 01 A7  08 0A 02 00  06 02 00 00    
..."............0144: 30 13 06 0F  2B 06 01 04  01 85 22 D5  0C 01 A7 08    
0...+.....".....0160: 0A 03 00 04  00 30 14 06  0F 2B 06 01  04 01 85 22    
.....0...+....."0176: D5 0C 01 A7  08 0A 04 00  02 01 00 30  14 06 0F 2B    
...........0...+0192: 06 01 04 01  85 22 D5 0C  01 A7 08 0A  05 00 02 01    
....."..........0208: 00 30 13 06  0F 2B 06 01  04 01 85 22  D5 0C 01 A7    
.0...+....."....0224: 08 0A 06 00  04 00                                    
......> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:00:18 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: smux trap from Dell OpenManage issue> CC: 
[email protected]> > Jayson Robinson wrote:> > Dell 
OpenManage is configured as a smux peer to two systems 1) running> > net-snmp 
5.3 and the other system is running net-snmp 5.0.9.> > > > On the 5.0.9 system 
the smux peer sends the trap and the trap receiver> > gets it like:> > > > 
1182527504 2007-06-22 11:51::44 [xxxxxx] [TRAP2, SNMP v2c, community> > xxxxxx] 
Cold Start 0 BINDS DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::sysUpTimeInstance => > 0:0:00:21.81 
SNMPv2-MIB::snmpTrapOID.0 => > MIB-Dell-10892::alertTemperatureProbeNormal> > 
MIB-Dell-10892::alertSystem.0 = "localhost.localdomain"    > > 
MIB-Dell-10892::alertTableIndexOID.0 => > 
MIB-Dell-10892::temperatureProbeIndex.1.1       > > 
MIB-Dell-10892::alertMessage.0 = "Temperature sensor returned to a> > normal 
value> > > > On the 5.3 system the smux peer sends the trap and the trap 
receiver> > gets it like:> > 1182527992 2007-06-22 11:59::52 [xxxxxx] [TRAP2, 
SNMP v2c, community> > xxxxxx] Cold Start 0 BINDS 
DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::sysUpTimeInstance => > 0:0:00:45.27 SNMPv2-MIB::snmpTrapOID.0 
=> > MIB-Dell-10892::alertTemperatureProbeWarning       > > 
MIB-Dell-10892::alertSystem.0 = "00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00> > 00 
00 00> > If you enable packet dumps in snmpd with "-d", does it cover the smux> 
traffic? If so, it may be worth comparing the packets to see> whether/where 
they differ.> > > +Thomas> > -- > Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at 
blue-cable.de)> > 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------> This 
SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE 
version of DB2 express and take> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. 
Click to get it now.> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/> 
_______________________________________________> Net-snmp-users mailing list> 
[email protected]> Please see the following page to 
unsubscribe or change other options:> 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users> 
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! Check out the New 
MSN Mobile! 
http://mobile.msn.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to