Just one final question (I hope :-) ) To make a SET operation to a table, i would use the command : snmpset -v 2c -c public localhost MyLeaf i 1
When using a spinlock aproach, should I do : snmpset -v 2c -c public localhost SpinLockObject i 0 MyLeaf i 1 ??? Thank you very much for all your help. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "vsaavedra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:36 PM Subject: Re: Semaphore / Synchronizing write operations > On 23/10/2007, vsaavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't specify the netsnmp version. > > Due to hardware restraints, I'm using version 5.1.4. > > Fair enough. > The setSerialNo.c module was re-written just over three > years ago, to make use of the spinlock helper (and to > implement the object properly - i.e. as a scalar object, > not simply an instance) > > That implementation was first released in version 5.2 > of the agent (November 2004) > > > > Is netsnmp_register_watched_spinlock available in 5.1.4 Version ?? > > Yes. > Though it wasn't actually listed in the 'watcher.h' header file until 5.2. > So you might have to declare the API call in your module code file. > But the routine *is* present in the helper library. > > Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
