On 21/12/2007, Xuan Pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK. > > Just to confirm - does > > "snmpgetnext -v 1 -c public localhost ip" > > > > still return a noSuchName error? > > This one seems to work.
Good - that seems to be a change from earlier. What happens if you try to query your extension now? > snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost ipForwarding.0 also works > (but not the object ipForwarding. That's expected. > I also walked further to get some other objects such > as ipDefaultTTL.0, ipInReceives.0... It seems they have > a sub-identifier '.0' for each of the objects) Correct. *All* MIB OIDs returned from an SNMP agent will always have some form of "instance sub-identifier". This will be the index values for table objects, and .0 for scalars. Now that the agent is returning information from the IP-MIB, it's worth trying your extension MIB again. Dave PS: Please note that I may not be around much over the next couple of weeks. This is the last day before the University shuts for Christmas/New Year. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
