>>>>> "SB" == Sasidevi Buchupalli <Buchupalli> writes:
SB> May be it is a more general SNMP question than a net-snmp question. That's ok (unless the questions get really complex) ;-) SB> Is using usmUserSpinLock mandatory? Based on the RFC, it is an advisory SB> lock, which probably means it is recommended but not necessary. We are SB> in a situation, where the manager doesn't use it. But the agent is SB> failing if the manager doesn't include it in the requests for creating SB> entries or modifying entries in the USM table. What is the right SB> behavior? The agent should not be requiring the usage of the lock. It is optional for managers to use it and it is "advisory" as you state. The agent is in the wrong here. <soapbox> However, IMHO, it probably should have been mandatory. </soapbox> -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
