On 31/03/2008, Umesh Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am able to generate Traps messages by specifying the port number 162
>  in command as below.
>
> snmptrap  -v 1 -c public localhost:162  "" ""  2 0 ""
>
>
> Why we need to mention port number 162 ?, By default it should bind to port 
> 162.

Which version of the "snmptrap" command are you using?
("snmptrap -V")

There was a problem with the default trap port on some versions,
but I thought this had been fixed on all current releases.


>  I have verified my config files to check  whether i have mentioned default
> port number other then 162, i found  one entry in snmp.conf   file. In that  i
> have mentioned  default port number 161 and  i did it because by assuming
> this config file ment for agent hence i have given default port number 161 .

Port 161 is the standard port for SNMP *requests* (GET, GETNEXT, SET).
Port 162 is the standard port for SNMP *notifications* (TRAP, INFORM)

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to