thanks a lot Dave , now I get the difference .
2008/4/19, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 19/04/2008, snmp girl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am being confused , when should i use v1 or v 2c or even v3?
>
> You should use SNMPv3 when you are concerned about security.
> This version includes an authentication mechanism which ensures
> that a request or response has been sent from the system you
> expect (i.e. protects against spoofing), and hasn't been altered
> in transit (i.e. protects against tampering).
> It also includes an encryption mechanism, so that requests
> or responses can't be viewed en route.
>
>
> Neither SNMPv1 nor SNMPv2c provide any such guarantees.
> The only "security" (such as it is) is in the use of a supposedly
> unknown community string (although this could be determined
> by capturing network traffic), and in the source address of the
> request (although this could be forged).
>
>
> The main difference between SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c is in
> the protocol operations. The basic operations are mostly
> the same (Get/GetNext/Set/Trap), but SNMPv2c
> offers two more (GetBulk - a supercharged GetNext,
> and Inform - a Trap+acknowledgement).
>
> SNMPv2c also introduced improved error reporting for GET*
> and SET requests.
>
> If both the client and the agent you are using support SNMPv2c,
> this is generally preferable to SNMPv1, particularly with
> unsuccessful requests. But there's really not much
> difference between them.
>
> SNMPv3 gives you a lot more security (as in some, rather
> than none!), but is somewhat more complex to set up and
> to understand.
>
>
>
> > what can be changed if I send a trap with using v1 instead of v 2c ?
>
> The structure of an SNMPv1 trap is significantly different to that
> of SNMPv2. But the basic information contained is much the same.
> If your trap receiver understands SNMPv2c, then I'd be inclined to
> stick with that - it's conceptually slightly simpler.
>
>
> But fundamentally, the first question is always what version(s)
> the software that you are using understands. If you're just using
> Net-SNMP programs, you have a choice of all three. But some
> systems may only understand SNMPv1 or (perhaps less likely)
> only SNMPv3, or some other combination.
>
>
> Dave
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users