2008/5/7 Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK - I've managed to reproduce the problem.
>
> It also seems to be fixed in the current development code.
> It's just the released versions that suffer from this problem.

Wrong.
It *is* still present in the current development code.
(It was a different choice of default version that was
 masking the problem earlier).

The attached patch seems to fix things.
It's been applied to all active lines.

Dave
Index: snmplib/snmp_api.c
===================================================================
--- snmplib/snmp_api.c	(revision 16901)
+++ snmplib/snmp_api.c	(working copy)
@@ -1611,6 +1611,7 @@
     if (SNMP_FLAGS_USER_CREATED == (session->flags & SNMP_FLAGS_USER_CREATED) ||
         session->securityModel != SNMP_SEC_MODEL_USM ||
         session->version != SNMP_VERSION_3 ||
+        session->securityNameLen == 0 ||
         session->securityEngineIDLen == 0)
         return SNMPERR_SUCCESS;
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to