2008/5/8 valantina arumugam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1. Say the cache time is 6 sec & XX Table contains 8 instance. > snmwalk request comes at 3 rd sec
No. The loading of the cache would typically be triggered by the first SNMP request. So the beginning of the snmpwalk request would mark the *start* of the cache timeout period. Of course, if it takes longer than 6 seconds to walk the whole table, then yes - the cache would expire during this traversal, and you could potentially end up with inconsistent data. The answer there would be to increase the lifetime of the cache. This should be set to something slightly longer than the expected time to walk the table. It's a tradeoff between consistency and up-to-date information. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
