While I was reading the documentation on the net-snmp website, I noticed 
a few typos. The website says to send email to this address for web 
content issues.

None of the typos are major, but I thought you might like to know.

http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/commands/snmpgetnext.html
"regardless of weather" should be "regardless of whether"

http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/commands/snmpget.html
"The result from a command using the SNMPv2c version would have been the 
same."
It sounds like SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c are being compared for snmpget, but 
both example commands are using SNMPv2c:
% snmpget -c demopublic -v 2c test.net-snmp.org system.sysUpTime.0
% snmpget -v 2c -c demopublic test.net-snmp.org system.sysUpTime.0


http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/commands/snmptrap-v3.html
"if you want it to send a an INFORM instead"

http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/commands/output-options.html
"Similarly, this flag controls whether you want to display enumerated 
lists numerically or with textual translations (this example will not 
work for you the:"

http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/commands/output-options.html
"snmptranslate -Td -R usmUserEntry" should be "snmptranslate -Td -IR 
usmUserEntry"

-- 

Kyle Stemen
Software Developer

T 425.378.7887 x204 F 425.484.6316 E [email protected]
15395 SE 30th Place, Suite 140
Bellevue, WA 98007
www.likewise.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to