2009/4/6 huangweiwei039 <huangweiwei...@163.com>: > But in RFC,the object I handled is R/W.
Various objects in the ipRouteTable have a *maximum* access of read-write. That doesn't mean that every agent necessarily implements them as such. > when I use "snmpset" to handle other object which is not in a > table,the result is OK. You haven't said which object, but it seems clear that this particular object *has* been implemented as writeable. > Can you tell me why? The original route implementation was read-only. It simply doesn't include any code to handle SET requests. I'm not sure whether the more recent ipCidrRouteTable includes SET support or not, but it's probably worth a try. Make sure you are using the most recent release for best results. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
